Peter Jones

Rome’s collegiate system was more logical than America’s

Getty Images 
issue 14 November 2020

So Humpty Trumpty has had his great fall. But how democratic or logical was his election in the first place since, thanks to the USA’s ‘collegiate’ system, he became POTUS even though he lost by three million votes? Romans, too, used an undemocratic collegiate system for appointing their consuls, but at least there was a certain logic to it.

The logic arose from the Roman ‘class’ system. This defined both how much tax you paid, and in which ‘college’ you were placed for voting purposes. To these ends, regular property censuses divided citizens into seven bands by wealth.

The top band (equites) consisted of the richest in society, from which senators were drawn; then followed five classes graded by wealth (expressed as the ability to provide armour); and finally the last band, the proletarii who could provide only children (proles, ‘child’).

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in