Martin Vander Weyer Martin Vander Weyer

Righteous anger

Can a documentary ever be as entertaining as a fictional feature film? And, if it can, does that mean it cannot be a serious contribution to public debate?

issue 11 June 2011

Can a documentary ever be as entertaining as a fictional feature film? And, if it can, does that mean it cannot be a serious contribution to public debate? Inside Job, director Charles Ferguson’s Oscar-winning account of the origins of the US subprime mortgage debacle and the 2008 banking crisis, is a case in point. It is compelling viewing — and as a guide to why the financial world went mad, it is more vivid than any screen drama I’ve seen (though the BBC’s The Last Days of Lehman Brothers felt pretty authentic), and easier to absorb than any of a shelf full of books on the subject.

But that doesn’t mean it is an even-handed account of what happened: far from it. Right from the prologue — which fingers financial deregulation as the root cause of national bankruptcy in Iceland — Inside Job is fiercely hostile to free markets. It juxtaposes details of the pay and lifestyles of bankers like Dick Fuld of Lehman with shots of boarded-up houses and jobless Americans in tents.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in