We all know that the state grew enormously under thirteen years of Labour government.
The most obvious manifestation of this was public spending – an increase of 60 percent in real terms took Britain from having one of the lowest levels of government spending in the OECD in
2000 (36.6 percent of GDP) to having one of the highest in 2010 (52.5 percent of GDP).
But while reducing spending is clearly the most pressing issue facing the coalition government, we should not overlook another area where the state has grown dramatically: regulation. The British Chambers of Commerce’s ‘Burdens Barometer’ estimates that net cost of major regulations passed since 1998 is £88.3bn, while the Labour government’s own Better Regulation Task Force suggested that the annual cost of regulation to the British economy had grown to an astonishing 10–12 percent of GDP – a figure roughly equivalent to the income tax burden.
Indeed, many economists argue that over-regulation does more damage to our growth prospects than high taxes, so addressing regulation will clearly have to be a major part of any pro-growth agenda.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33b44/33b44f1966e79a8bbc533866eeb159e672891b43" alt=""
Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in