Much ado about this 55 percent proposal – whereby that proportion of the House,
rather than just over 50 percent, would be required to vote down a government – and rightly so. But, as so often, Iain Martin says all that needs to be said. Here’s a snippet from his must-read post:
This is one of those cases where the overwhelming beneficiaries are those parties in power – and where they would surely oppose it were they not in power. For that reason alone, it all looks rather suspect.“It is rather stretching things to try and present this piece of proposed gerrymandering as ‘Political Reform.’ It is actually designed to ensure that even a walk-out of the whole Lib Dem parliamentary group couldn’t actually bring down this government. This would weaken parliament and strengthen the hand of the executive considerably – when it is only weeks since both parties were talking of doing the opposite.”
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in