Ross Clark Ross Clark

Red tape and big money

Red tape and big money

issue 30 June 2007

There aren’t many people who can say that Gordon Brown has cut their taxes. In fact, as far as I’m aware there are just managers of private equity funds — and me.

The Chancellor’s introduction of the flat-rate VAT scheme in 2002 was so uncharacteristic that it took me a whole year to work out that I could simplify my VAT returns and save several thousand pounds a year. Sadly that simple reform, which allows small businesses to reclaim VAT as a fixed percentage of turnover rather than on each item — and rewards cheapskates like me who run up very low expenses — was to be a one-off.

Otherwise, for small businesses the Blair years have been about just three things: regulation, regulation, regulation. To have been a small businessman in 1997 must have been rather like being a strapping youth in 1914: the wrong time to be alive.

Businesspeople weren’t to know, on the glorious early summer morning that was 2 May 1997 when our new leader was so full of talk of a new Britain of opportunity, that months later they would find themselves bogged down in the quagmire of the Working Time Regulations, which restricted workers to a 48-hour week unless they signed an ‘opt-out’ — and that this would later be extended even to senior managers. Directors of small firms are now obliged, if they want to work more than 48 hours, to fill in time-sheets — somehow deciding how much of their working breakfast was spent cutting a deal and how much spent chewing a croissant.

Neither could businessmen in 1997 have guessed how grim would be the No Mans’ Land of equality laws. When you are about to employ somebody, do you ask for their date of birth, and risk prosecution under the new age-discrimination laws? Or do you decide not to ask for it and so be unable to supply the employee’s details to HM Revenue and Customs or carry out police checks where necessary? What are you supposed to do when the doorways of your care home have been found to be 5mm too narrow for the Care Standards Act, but the building is listed and cannot be altered? No one seems to know.

GIF Image

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in