Philip Hensher

Reading the classics should be a joy, not a duty

Edwin Frank’s survey of 20th-century fiction stresses the po-faced seriousness of the great novel. But many masterpieces revel in the ridiculous – or are about nothing at all

Pearl S. Buck, author of the prize-winning epic The Good Earth, now the property of bored specialists at best. [Getty Images] 
issue 16 November 2024

Writing the history of the novel, even covering a limited period, is a challenge. No one could possibly read every novel that has been published. Even if you read 100 a year you would scarcely scratch the surface. It isn’t like writing a history of most other subjects, where the important matters select themselves.

You wouldn’t guess from this book how hilarious Lolita is, or some of the best passages of Ulysses

No one could say with certainty that the most noteworthy novels are those which once made, or now make, the most impact. Indeed, a history that included many of the bestsellers of the day would be unusual – one, for instance, that took in G.W.M. Reynolds’s 1844 The Mysteries of London, probably the most popular novel of the entire 19th century in England, or Hall Caine’s The Manxman, whose colossal sales single-handedly put an end to the three-volume door-stopper in 1894.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in