Deborah Ross

Quiet yet beautiful – and there’s plenty of sex: Lady Chatterley’s Lover reviewed

Compared to Ken Russell’s 1990s romp, this adaptation is more of a gentle, affecting love story – though you won’t feel short-changed on the sex front

Emma Corin as Connie and Jack O'Connell as Mellors in Lady Chatterley's Lover. Image: courtesy of Netflix © 2022  
issue 03 December 2022

If you’re of my generation, I expect your first encounter with D.H Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover was the (well-thumbed) book passed around school and then maybe Ken Russell’s full-frontal, hut-shaking, 1993 television adaptation starring Joely Richardson and Sean Bean at his most Sean Bean. (‘I wan’ yer, m’lady.’) But this Netflix version doesn’t play it as high-toned smut or as a pop-culture joke. It’s more in keeping with Lawrence’s alternative title for the novel, Tenderness, and it’s more a gentle, affecting, immersive love story than a sex story although there is plenty of sex in it. You’re not about to be short-changed there, m’lady.

It’s more a gentle love story than a sex story although there is plenty of sex in it

The film is directed by Laure de Cleremont-Tonnerre (The Mustang) and stars Emma Corrin as Constance. Corrin first made a splash as Princess Diana in The Crown and she isn’t obvious casting, but she’s wonderful.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in