Mark Galeotti Mark Galeotti

Putin’s Kaliningrad visit wasn’t a threat to Nato

(Photo: Getty)

President visits part of his own country. Shock. Vladimir Putin’s visit yesterday to the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad, perched precariously on the other side of the Baltic states, was not, as some overheated commentary has claimed, a threat to Nato. Rather, it was a sign of his renewed need to campaign domestically.

The threat from Kaliningrad and to the Suwałki Gap is heavily mythologised

Kaliningrad, once East Prussian Königsberg, is a territory a little larger than Northern Ireland that was annexed by the Soviets at the end of the second world war and subject to an intensive period of industrialisation, militarisation and colonisation. More than three quarters of the population are now ethnic Russians, and although a handful of activists claim there is strong support for independence (last year, the self-proclaimed Free Nations of Post-Russia Forum held a methodologically-dubious internet poll which they claimed showed 72 per cent in favour), there is no sign of any particular disaffection.

Mark Galeotti
Written by
Mark Galeotti

Mark Galeotti heads the consultancy Mayak Intelligence and is honorary professor at the UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies and the author of some 30 books on Russia. His latest, Forged in War: a military history of Russia from its beginnings to today, is out now.

Topics in this article

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in