Trailed as an historic address to the nation following the weekend’s Wagner rebellion, Vladimir Putin’s short speech on Monday night was instead an unconvincing condemnation of everything generally and nothing much specifically. If the speech was historic, it was only because of the way the president brought up Russia’s historical betrayals and revolutions.
No amount of snarling and lip-curling could distract from the feebleness of Putin’s argument on Monday night
Putin’s (mis)uses of historical grievance often cause bemusement in the West but it serves him well domestically. Replicated by the Kremlin propaganda machine, the President’s messages about the chaotic, desperate 1990s and the long scars of Russia’s bloody 20th century civil wars are carefully designed to invoke fear of what might follow his exit from power. This is coupled with promises, never quite manifested, of a return to Soviet-era greatness and self-sufficiency. The Kremlin’s incessant replaying of past triumphs and trauma has played a crucial role in Russian people acquiescing to an increasingly authoritarian regime and catastrophically aggressive foreign policy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33b44/33b44f1966e79a8bbc533866eeb159e672891b43" alt=""
Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in