Lisa Haseldine Lisa Haseldine

How seriously should we take Putin’s nuclear threat?

Vladimir Putin (Credit: Getty images)

Vladimir Putin has announced the partial mobilisation of the Russian armed forces. In a pre-recorded address delayed from last night, the Russian president declared that all reservists would be called up for service in Ukraine. Nuclear war, he stressed, was not off the table. 

In tones bordering on the hysterical, Putin declared that Nato leaders had been discussing the possibility and acceptability of using nuclear weapons against Russia: 

‘I want to remind those who allow themselves to make such statements about Russia, we too have various means of destruction at our disposal that are more varied and modern than those owned by Nato countries. If Russia’s territorial integrity is threatened, we will of course use all means available to use for the protection of Russia and our people.’ 

Putin’s speech is a statement of intent. He is willing to strike

This mine-is-better-than-yours boast will put Kremlin-watchers on edge. While until now the Russian army has been known to rely predominantly on Soviet-era weaponry far less technologically advanced than that supplied to Ukraine, making Putin’s threat of suddenly whipping out weapons more modern than Nato’s unlikely, it is nevertheless a statement of intent.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in