Ken Clarke has laid another argument
against prison. There is no link, he alleges, between falling crime rates and spiralling prisoner numbers. Well, perhaps not, but it’s quite a coincidence. Clarke has been tasked with the
impossible: assuring an easily frightened public that releasing prisoners will not lead to more muggings, robberies and intimidation.
There are arguments on both sides. A recent Spectator editorial took the Michael Howard line that prison works
and crime costs. The opposition does not contest either of those propositions, just if prison alone is the best way to reduce crime. The outgoing Chief Inspector of Prisons, Dame Anne Owers, argues
in the Guardian for investment in remedial programmes. She concedes, not for the first
time, that funding prisoner education, mental health schemes and resettlement work never matched the 27 percent rise in prison numbers over the course of her tenure.
Small wonder that re-offending remains a perpetual blight.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33b44/33b44f1966e79a8bbc533866eeb159e672891b43" alt=""
Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in