Mary Dejevsky

Pensioners should do national service

They have far more life experience

  • From Spectator Life
A member of the Home Guard in 1940 getting in some rifle practice (Getty)

When Rishi Sunak proposed national service for 18-year-olds as the first big idea of his election campaign, my initial thought was: absolutely, bring it on. But then I had a second thought, which was that if Sunak was trying to boost the Conservative vote, rather than the nation’s preparedness, his big idea probably wasn’t going to fly. Younger voters would recall their 18-year-old selves and reject the whole prospect out of hand – as would parents, concerned that their now not so little Harrys (and Hannahs) might be sent off to fight in Ukraine. Meanwhile, all those older people agreeing that the nation’s youth could do with some toughening up will probably be voting Tory anyway. 

There are plenty of roles that our new pensioner recruit could usefully perform

Then a light switched on: right idea, wrong demographic. How about requiring first-year pensioners to follow the Rishi recipe for national service by spending either the full year with the military or a weekend a month volunteering for a good cause? Think about it.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in