John Casey

Pawn or game-changer?

issue 10 September 2011

The British were in Burma for more than 120 years, but were never sure what to do with it. They completed their conquest in 1885, annexing Upper Burma and abolishing the ancient, semi-divine monarchy, apparently on the whim of Randolph Churchill. This was contrary to the British imperial tradition of indirect rule, and brought about a crisis of legitimacy which was never overcome. British rule was never fully accepted, even though the country prospered under the Raj, becoming the greatest exporter of rice in the world. In the short-lived democracy after independence, the rather bumbling U-Nu kept winning landslide victories in elections. But he was overthrown in an army coup which established a sort of voodoo socialism under the enigmatic General Ne Win, who proceeded to impoverish the country, while enriching himself, and cutting Burma off from most contact with the outside world. Burma became a largely forgotten country.

There things remained until the great insurrection of 1988 in which the whole of Burmese society seemed to join, until it was put down with great brutality.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in