These are hard times for the government and there is no respite. Today, parliament will
debate a prisoner’s right to vote, in accordance with the wishes of the resented European Court of Human Rights. The Guardian’s Patrick Wintour writes what many suspect: on the back of a free vote, the House will deny prisoners the right to vote in all cases
and outlaw compensation claims.
Such a result would seem a set-back for the government, which was thought to favour a limited
franchise on prisoner voting. If it became law, then the government would apparently be at odds with the ECHR – precipitating an ignominious procession of grasping lags, searching for
compensation at Strasbourg.
That may yet happen, but there are plenty of reasons to hope that it won’t:
1). The ECHR’s original judgement was not absolute. It did not judge that blanket bans or substantial bans contravene human rights.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just £1 a month
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just £1 a monthAlready a subscriber? Log in