Jamie Blackett

Our tree-planting obsession may do more harm than good

The benefits are often exaggerated — and seldom weighed against the downsides

issue 07 December 2019

‘Four beef burgers is the same as flying to New York and back! FOUR BURGERS!’ When I arrived at the Extinction Rebellion demo, the first person I met was a woman activist, clad from head to foot in ocean-polluting, synthetic fibres, talking absolute nonsense.

And because I’m a beef farmer, I felt I should set her straight. I explained that no, my grass-fed beef does not harm the planet, and asked her what on earth she expected the farmers of Britain to do if they couldn’t keep cows. ‘Ah,’ she says, folding her arms, ‘they should just grow trees.’

Trees are fast becoming the answer to everything. Worried about floods? Don’t bother dredging rivers, just plant forests. Anxious about the effect on the environment of flying? Get your PR to tweet about all the trees you have planted on your Hampshire estate. Want to spend Christmas at Chequers? Make sure your party manifesto commits to more trees, and not just of the magic money variety.

‘So much for the parties’ tree-planting pledge.’

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in