James Tooley

Our browbeaten universities

The row over vice-chancellors’ salaries misses a vital point

issue 16 September 2017

Are university vice-chancellors paid too much? The government clearly thinks so, and is planning to fine universities that can’t justify paying their leaders more than the Prime Minister’s salary of £150,000 per annum.

Louise Richardson, vice-chancellor of Oxford University (salary £350,000), strongly disagrees, and has contrasted her salary negatively with those of bankers and footballers. But bankers and footballers work in the private sector and so are not the concern of government. It’s surely an established principle that government can intervene in the pay of chief executives of public bodies, but not of private ones. And any fool knows that universities are public bodies.

Or are they? Actually, Professor Richardson is on to something important. It’s a myth that we have public universities in England. It is worth reiterating (because in my experience, it’s always news to someone) that our universities are all in fact private institutions.

Richardson’s university is a civil corporation, first established under common law, then formally incorporated in 1571 under the name ‘The Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford’.

Most of the other old universities are corporations under Royal Charters, which spell out the corporation’s objectives and typically include all graduates as university members.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in