Forget the hubbub about Gove’s schools list, the most damaging story for the government
this week could well be on the cover of today’s FT. Alex Barker does a great job of summarising it here. But the central point is that the Office for Budget Responsibility changed its forecasting
methods just before the Budget, with the effect of reducing how many public sector jobs would be lost due to the government’s measures. This isn’t damning on its own: statisticians constantly tweak
their forecasting methods. But when you consider that the OBR’s new methods incorporated policies which haven’t even been announced yet (including one which pre-empts the findings of John Hutton’s
pensions commission), then it starts to look more dubious.
David Cameron used the revised figures to claim that there would be fewer public sector job losses under coalition plans than under Labour’s plans.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in