Sam Leith Sam Leith

Olden but not golden

issue 09 October 2004

‘Roy Hattersley,’ said Becky, tilting her head on one side to read the spine of the thick red book I had brought away with me to the house party. ‘The Edwardians. Are there four more depressing words in the language?’

Now, that’s not fair. He may be a bit of a windbag, but he’s our windbag, and he has obviously done a good deal of work on a book about a lively period in our history. His tour d’horizon of the Edwardian age takes in 360 degrees of horizon.

It is largely a work of summary, coloured by its author’s partisanship, and given original flavour by quotes from the unpublished diaries of three different Edward- ians: a Duke of Devonshire; a children’s nanny with a family in Ascot; and young Rowland Evans, ‘schoolboy son of a Bradford Nonconformist minister’.

Hattersley’s contention is that most of us think of the years from 1900 to 1914 as a sunny and inconsequential interlude of cricket jerseys and drawing-room comedies: a ‘long and leisurely afternoon’ leading, unawares, towards the chimps’ tea parties of Passchendaele and the Somme.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in