Martin Gayford

Object lesson | 3 August 2017

Items like his beloved chocolate pot – on display at the Royal Academy's new exhibition – played roles in his pictures, like actors

issue 05 August 2017

Why did Henri Matisse not play chess? It’s a question, perhaps, that few have ever pondered. Yet the great artist provided an answer, which is quoted in the catalogue to Matisse in the Studio, a marvellous new exhibition at the Royal Academy. He did not care, he explained, ‘to play with signs that never change’. It’s a revealing reason in several ways.

For one thing, it underlines how different Matisse was from his younger contemporary Marcel Duchamp: the most celebrated chess-player in art. Duchamp loved logic, so his work tended to turn into a series of theorems. Matisse, in contrast, lived and worked in a beautiful muddle, surrounded by clutter that included textiles, ceramics, an old chocolate pot, African sculptures, a wooden panel carved with Chinese calligraphy, jugs, vases and a bizarre Venetian chair that he’d picked up in an antique shop. As a title, Matisse and his Bric-à-brac would not have worked so well on posters, but it’s the theme of the exhibition — and a rich one.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in