John Charmley

New virtues for old

issue 03 December 2005

It can be reliably predicated that few Spectator readers will disagree with the general thrust of the essays in this volume, which is that our society is a decadent one, in which an emphasis on personal virtue and responsibility is being replaced by the intrusive activities of the nanny state. In every sphere of our public and private lives, there has appeared an army of clip-boarded bureaucrats dedicated to ensuring that at no time does anyone act on their own initiative (this would lack ‘transparency’) or discretion. As Professor Minogue (whose essay shines out even in this distinguished company) argues in his chapter on ‘Prudence’, it is ‘the joker in the moral pack’ in so far as it allows us to temper our virtues according to the circumstances we feel are appropriate; one of the most lamentable aspects of modern life is that the room for its exercise is being constantly diminished by the state.

The first part of this book deals with the ‘old virtues’: prudence; courage; thrift; disinterest and the ‘family virtues’ of authority, obedience, stewardship and succession — all of which would attract the approbation of most readers.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in