Douglas Murray Douglas Murray

Neither short nor sharp nor shocking

issue 20 March 2004

To be fair to him, George C. Schoolfield, of Yale University, does admit in his opening sentence that ‘movement’ may be too strong a word to describe the collection of writers on whom his Baedeker focuses. So, I think, may ‘fashion’. Links between authors in these 23 cross-global chapters are certainly thin — here an admiring letter, there a nabbed theme — and with some it is hard to see any link other than date and drivel.

Each country has a chapter, and for that chapter they are allowed usually no more than one representative entry. Thus we get chapters on the decadent movement of Wales (entry: Arthur Machen) as well as that of Australia (Henry Handel Richardson).

Other entries are justified: Huysmans is here, as are Strindberg and Rilke. But from there the names become less familiar and pose another problem — one which Schoolfield is aware of, though helpless before: many texts under discussion have never appeared in English translation, so we are in the dreaded world of plot-summaries.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in