Clarissa Farr

Mixed blessing: do single-sex schools have a future?

  • From Spectator Life
Illustration by Anna Trench

If you were starting with a blank screen to design an education system today, it seems unlikely that you would think of creating single-sex schools, any more than you would single-sex professions or single-sex restaurants. Education for life is something we do together, like working or eating. Their existence is explained by the fact that when the first were established, most girls didn’t go to school. William of Wykeham founded Winchester in 1382 for ‘poore scholars’ who would be boys — that was obvious. Dean John Colet founded St Paul’s School in 1509, taking advice from Erasmus of Rotterdam and putting the management of the 153 scholars ‘from all nacions and all countres indifferently’ into the hands of the Mercers’ Company. These men were visionaries who thought about wide access and international reach. Were they alive today, would they exclude girls from that vision?

Schools for girls developed much later.

Written by
Clarissa Farr
Clarissa Farr was high mistress of St Paul’s Girls’ School and is author of The Making of Us: Why School Matters. She is former chairman of the Girls’ Schools Association and a governor of Winchester College.

Topics in this article

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in