It has been a mixed week for Parliamentary Select Committees: they have regained some of
their bite, but recent events have also served to remind us of their supine performances in the past. Yesterday it was the turn of the Defence Committee to seek our attention, briefing their
latest report on the British military campaign in Helmand to the Sunday Telegraph. Under the headline ‘British Force Was Too Weak to Defeat
Taliban’, we read of ‘a devastating report’ which is ‘deeply critical of senior commanders and government ministers’. But, the Committee have got some fairly crucial
things wrong. They conclude that the task force was ‘capped at 3,150 for financial reasons’. This is untrue: more important than finances was the ongoing commitment in Iraq, together
with the Army’s own ‘cap’ on the number of soldiers it could deploy on a sustainable basis across both operations. They also conclude it is ‘unlikely’ that the
decision to deploy troops to Northern Helmand in summer 2006 was put to ministers, and argue that it should have been put to Cabinet.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in