The primary experience of looking at painting is the crucial encounter between a painted surface and the human eye. Nothing is quite like it, and this unique experience cannot be replaced or replicated by looking at a painting in printed reproduction or on a computer screen. This may be a truism but it is worth emphasising once again in an age that relies increasingly on mediated experience, and lives — almost literally — by the screen. It is a truth brought into especial prominence by the concatenation of three exhibitions currently showing in London.
Photography does not require the same intimate experience of viewing. A reprographic medium, it appears (in these days of high-quality printing) without significant distortion in books and catalogues, and the photography enthusiast need scarcely stray from his armchair to enjoy the fruits of his chosen medium. The principal aspect of photography that cannot be adequately conveyed in book form is scale, which is why so many contemporary photographers elect to work on a gigantic format.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in