Dot Wordsworth

Mind your language | 6 May 2006

A Lexicographer writes

issue 06 May 2006

On BBC television’s Newsnight they have got one of their reporters to live for a year ‘ethically’. By this they do not mean that he must remain faithful to his wife, eschew false expenses claims, be patient with his children and observe a strict adherence to the truth, though no doubt these virtues already come second-nature to him. They mean he should be green.

This ethicality entails low-energy lightbulbs, cycling, recycling and the forswearing of aeroplane travel. What Aristotle’s opinion would be of this notion of ethics I leave to my neighbour Dr Jones, but it was certainly to the Greek philosopher that we owe the term. Aristotle’s book Ethics, ethika in Greek, using the plural of ethikos, derived from ethos, meaning ‘character’ or ‘manners’. Like other such plural terms — physics, maths, metaphysics, measles — we now use ethics as singular.

There was a perfectly good English word with the same meaning, which we now use, if at all, to mean something else. Thews is the word, and King Alfred and his friends in the late 9th century used it to mean ‘morals’, ‘behaviour’, ‘virtue’. It was only in Shakespeare’s time that thews came to mean physical characteristics, and the word then fell into disuse until the inventive Walter Scott popularised it with a new meaning of ‘muscles’.

Ethics had quite supplanted it by the Renaissance, and then in the 19th century the word acquired three specialised meanings which happily cohabited in interconnecting semantic fields.

Ethics in one enclosure referred to the civic or political (as opposed to the personal) aspects of moral behaviour. In a neighbouring paddock ethics applied to professional standards (of the kind that the vet in The Archers has been contemplating under pressure from the wicked Matt).

GIF Image

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in