Dot Wordsworth

Mind your language | 3 July 2010

A reader has written to complain that a contributor to The Spectator used the construction ‘I was sat’.

issue 03 July 2010

A reader has written to complain that a contributor to The Spectator used the construction ‘I was sat’.

A reader has written to complain that a contributor to The Spectator used the construction ‘I was sat’. Veronica has also shown me an article in the Daily Mail about sex tourists in Thailand, which says: ‘Sat at a crowded bar at 2 a.m. is Peter.’ This is a most unaccountable usage, rolling over us unstoppably. Yet when I turned to The Spectator (no relation) written by Joseph Addison for July 20, 1711, I found this: ‘The Court was sat before Sir Roger came; but notwithstanding all the Justices had taken their Places upon the Bench, they made room for the old Knight at the Head of them.’

Another source from 1700 has: ‘Being all sate down, we fell a talking.’ Later in the century Oliver Goldsmith does it: ‘They were scarcely sat down, before one of the housemaids came.’

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in