Robert Skidelsky

Milton Friedman – economic visionary or scourge of the world?

Monetarism, with which his name is associated, has long defined economic policy. But what would Friedman have made of the banking collapse, so soon after his death in 2006?

Milton Friedman in Washington in 1980. [Alamy] 
issue 13 January 2024

The Keynesian economist Nicholas Kaldor called Milton Friedman one of the two most evil men of the 20th century. (Friedman was in distinguished company.) The ‘scourge’ he inflicted on the world was monetarism, a product of what Kaldor called Friedman’s Big Lie – of which more later. Moral judgments aside, how does Friedman rank in the world of 20th-century economists? By common consent, he stands with Friedrich Hayek and John Maynard Keynes at the apex of his profession. All wrestled with the defining problem of their age: the radical economic and political instability of the 1920s and 1930s.

Their responses reflected their national situations. Keynes, economically secure and confident in Britain’s political aristocracy, turned to the state to provide the stability lacking in markets. Hayek, fleeing the hyperinflation of central Europe, saw the state as the cause, not healer, of economic disasters. Friedman, the aspiring son of Jewish immigrants, put his faith in the ‘land of opportunity, in which anything is possible’.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in