Theodore Dalrymple

Medicine and letters | 14 June 2006

I am not sure how far Schopenhauer is suitable reading for a doctor.

issue 17 June 2006

My copy of Schopenhauer’s essays was owned before me also by a doctor, J. Raymond Hinshaw, MD. Hinshaw, a former Rhodes Scholar, was professor of surgery at Rochester, New York, and an expert in the use of lasers in surgery upon which subject he wrote a book. He died in 1993, aged 70, and the postgraduate medical centre in Rochester is named in his honour.

I am not sure how far Schopenhauer is suitable reading for a doctor. Whatever their mental reservations, doctors are committed to optimism, to the belief that life can be made better or at least more bearable. Schopenhauer, on the other hand, sees human life as a dialectic between pain and boredom. If we achieve what we strive for, which is the removal of nagging dissatisfaction, then we are confronted by the nullity and pointlessness of human existence. Schopenhauer also believed what I came to conclude from observation of my patients and daily life in Britain, namely that entertainment, or rather distraction, was both a cause and consequence of ineradicable boredom.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in