The Leveson Inquiry has all the makings of an establishment disaster. In saying that, I
am not defending the behaviour of the tabloids. I find it contemptible that no story in the ‘hackgate’ scandal can be justified on public interest grounds. Not once did James and Rupert Murdoch
hirelings break the law to expose an abuse of power, or the corruption of an official, or corporate wrongdoing.
It is a measure of their degradation that they did not think they needed to act in their own self-interest by covering their backs with a few reputable investigations. Although there is no jurisdiction in the world that allows journalists to hack phones, the jury system of the Anglo-Saxon democracies would have protected reporters who had been pursuing worthwhile stories. If the state had charged them, they would have been able to say to the jury words to the effect of ‘well, yes, technically, what we did was illegal, but we did it for good reasons so would you please acquit us’.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33b44/33b44f1966e79a8bbc533866eeb159e672891b43" alt=""
Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in