Most of us are, I think, temperamentally opposed to the idea of a society in which we are surveilled 24/7. We look at the proliferation of Ring doorbells, the thickets of CCTV cameras that capture our every trip to the shop from multiple angles, the algorithmic harvesting of our data by every website we use to shop, to exchange messages with friends, or to scour the wisdom of the internet for information, and we give a slight shudder of revulsion.
We are put in mind of the grim grey men in headphones listening in on bugged conversations for the Stasi in the grim grey film The Lives of Others. We look down the road to China, with its sinister social credit systems and its enthusiasm for biometrics. We think: yuk. We are not a nation, we think with a mild but palpable swelling of pride, of curtain-twitchers, looky-loos, busybodies and snitches.
Litter louts break the law because they simply can’t be bothered
How then, are we to respond to the proposal by Buckinghamshire council to invite drivers to use their dashcam footage to dob in fly-tippers and vehicular litter-louts? With more sympathy, apparently, than we might expect from the above.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in