Even as the Christmas season draws in upon us, the academy’s best-loved post-foxhunting bloodsport — pointing out scholarly inadequacies in the new Dictionary of National Biography — continues. The latest and most eye-stretchingly savage instance comes from Nikolai Tolstoy, in a letter prominently published in the TLS. He complains that in August 2002 he was contacted for help by an in-house DNB scribe who had been commissioned to write the entry for his stepfather, the historical novelist Patrick O’Brian. Tolstoy — who was working on his own full-length biography, and knew that O’Brian had taken several liberties with the facts of his own life over the years — asked his interlocutor starchily ‘what were his qualifications for writing on a subject of whose most basic rudiments he was confessedly ignorant’. The answer did not give satisfaction, and he went on to contact the DNB’s editor who, he claims, refused to reveal the name of the writer, and ‘cavalierly rejected my misgivings’.
issue 11 December 2004
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in