Why we allowed it
Sir: In her article ‘Why didn’t more people resist lockdown?’ (3 September), Lionel Shriver partially answers her own question. Priti Patel told us it was our public duty to shop our neighbours if they had three friends to tea, and our previously invisible police force started to patrol parks and beaches with unprecedented vigour, with a threat of £1,000 fines for malfeasance. There was no eagerness, but the public were glued to the nightly broadcasts from No. 10, where the PM told us we would be little better than murderers if we didn’t obey the diktats.
The fear all this created is still evident as I walk round Sainsbury’s every week and see masked shoppers disinfecting their trollies as if their life depended on it.
Martin Henry
Good Easter, Essex
Violating our freedom
Sir: Lee Cain defends the dictatorship of which he was part (as No. 10’s director of communications) by asking us if we believe that without lockdown, ‘people would have voluntarily stayed at home and avoided social contacts, as in Sweden, so restrictions were not needed’? (Letters, 3 September).
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in