The Spectator

Letters: The Syria debate, plus Giles Milton on Andro Linklater

issue 07 September 2013

Syrian matters

Sir: Though Syria (Leading article, 31 August) is certainly no laughing matter, the turmoil prevailing over a ‘punitive strike’ does bring to mind the little jingle of A.P. Herbert, during the Phony War of 1940. Some great minds were contemplating a ‘strike’ on the Soviet Union to punish it for its invasion of little Finland. Herbert’s verse was called ‘Baku, or the Map Game’, and begins:

It’s jolly to look at the map, and finish the foe in a day.
It’s not easy to get at the chap; these neutrals are so in the way.
But what if you say ‘What would you do to fill the aggressor with gloom?’
Well, we might drop a bomb on Baku. Or what about bombs on Batum?
It ends:
…And then, it’s so hard to say who, is -fighting, precisely, with whom,
that I know about bombing Baku, I insist upon bombing Batum.





Thank God we didn’t bomb Baku, or even Batum; but are we any wiser than we were then?
Alistair Horne
Oxfordshire
 
Sir: Assad is not remotely as bad a man as his father.



Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in