
Reality check
Sir: While I share Mr Gove’s diagnosis of lodestar-less Starmerism (‘Cruel Labour’, 5 April), I cannot share the accompanying pearl-clutching.
For decades, politicians and voters have engaged in a mutually reinforcing entitlement spiral that took it as given that the civil service and welfare bill could expand ad infinitum, that working for a living was optional, and that our geopolitical enemies didn’t really mean what they said. This fantastical worldview was predicated on an equally fantastical delusion that cheap energy, low inflation and low interest rates were locked in rather than temporary historical blips. You can ignore reality, but you can’t ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.
Lee Jenkins
Bolton, Lancashire
Trust issues
Sir: When I heard of the National Trust’s proposal to leave Clandon Park as a ruin I was relieved that another pastiche as at Uppark was ruled out (Arts, 5 April). Reconstruction of badly damaged buildings is, I suppose, a way to soak up the insurance payout, but it is fake. There is no getting away from it. In other situations the Prince-Bishop’s Palace in Wurzburg is similarly a beautifully realised fake. So are the remains at Knossos: I was surprised at how much of the place Minoan builders had left until I found out how much reconstruction had been done by Arthur Evans and his team.
Why can’t they just leave things as they are? And, in the case of the National Trust, look after the place better. One all-consuming fire might be accounted a misfortune; two looks like carelessness.
Nicholas Wightwick
Rossett, Wrexham
Rave reviews
Sir: I sympathise with the Revd Franklin’s stance on ‘spiritually hollow’ events being held in sacred spaces (‘Foolish naves’, 5 April).

Comments
Join the debate for just £1 a month
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just £1 a monthAlready a subscriber? Log in