Letters: How to argue with Trump voters

Unhealthy debate

Sir: Matthew Parris is absolutely right to say that the time has come for facing populists with honest argument (‘In defence of the liberal elite’, 9 November). This call would be all the more persuasive if it were not embedded within the rotten foundations of current lamentable public discourse. Honest argument presupposes the ability to engage with one’s opponents in terms that they would own and recognise: ‘steel-manning’ rather than erecting a flimsy straw man. What Mr Parris, and many others, fail to own is that the concerns of Trump voters, though unpalatably incarnated in Donald Trump himself, are in their essence not only legitimate but good. A desire to provide for family and pursue dignified work are wholly good things; to merely say with ‘chins up’ that it is as black and white as wrong and right runs the risk of that elevated chin not only looking arrogant but being presented as a target.