The Spectator

Letters | 8 January 2011

Spectator readers respond to recent articles

issue 08 January 2011

Godly geologists

Sir: Bruce Anderson’s article in your Christmas special (‘Confession of an atheist’, 18/25 December) was a great example of the thoughtful and reasonable atheism of which we have been starved over recent years.

That said, he still makes one howling and oft-repeated error when he claims that Christianity never recovered ‘from the loss of medieval cosmology and the emergence of modern geology’.

The idea that it was science that was somehow responsible for the waning of Western religion is a relatively recent one, its origins lying in a number of popular but egregious histories of the two disciplines published in the late 19th century. It is badly wide of the mark.

The scientific revolution has its origins in narrowly Christian convictions. The founders of the Royal Society were deeply devout men, spurred on in their work by the presuppositions that creation was ordered, rational and comprehensible, and that by studying it they would better understand and glorify God.

Similarly, the first geologists (in Britain at least) were clergyman (William Buckland) or devout (Charles Lyell).

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in