Save our salmon
Sir: On a Winston Churchill scholarship to discover what other North Atlantic host countries were doing for beleaguered salmon numbers in the 1990s, I found that the Canadian government considered hydroelectric schemes far less green than wind farms (‘Something’s fishy’, 1 September). The Canadian experience was that hydro units minced fish, interfered with the movement of migratory species, and often produced electricity in amounts well below original specification targets.
On return to the UK, I looked closely at ‘my’ Scottish river, Carron Kyle of Sutherland. Water is abstracted from headwaters to feed turbines in a neighbouring catchment. The scheme built by the government is a complete barrier to migration for 365 days of the year and the tunnel leading water away is bone dry for a fortnight at a time. The salmon population wiped out would once have been the famous early season springers; how dirty is that?
Jonny Shaw
Ross
Population explosion
Sir: Brendan O’Neill criticises ‘population panic groups’ (‘Malthus’s children’, 25 August).
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in