The Spectator

Letters | 2 July 2011

<em>Spectator</em> readers respond to recent articles

issue 02 July 2011

Child benefit? No thanks!

Sir: I was particularly struck by Melanie McDonagh (‘What women want’, 25 June) trotting out the same old complaint about the ‘cloth-eared’ decision to take child benefit off families in the higher tax bracket. How and why have we got ourselves into a situation where even middle-class journalists think that they should be clients of the state? I was glad when the government saw sense and discontinued my child tax credit. Why should the government automatically give me money I don’t need, when my hard-earned taxes could be much better spent elsewhere?

Rachel Maclean
Solihull, West Midlands



Assisting suicide


Sir: Charles Moore doesn’t divulge the main reason why religious people oppose the idea of assisted suicide: that life being God-given we have no right to reject the gift (The Spectator’s Notes, 25 June). For those who don’t believe in the existence of a God, this is unpersuasive. As the philosopher Richard Robinson wrote in An Atheist’s Values (Oxford, 1964), ‘The chief argument for the legitimacy of suicide is that life is a trap. We have not asked for it, and it can be terrible.’

Dr Tim Hudson
Chichester



Sir: What a pity that Charles Moore, a man whose views I generally respect, should have jumped on the same anti-assisted-suicide bandwagon as Lady Finlay and the bishop with the funny foreign name. Perhaps he is more of a predictable RC than he claims after all. Does he think he knows more than I do about what I should have done about my first wife’s death? I would suggest that he try minding his own business. (Those who have forgotten about it — it was news about three years ago — can refresh their memories and read all about it by Googling my name + ‘suicide’.)

Michael Grosvenor Myer
Haddenham, Cambridge



Gay wrongs

Sir: The kind of taboo but extensive homosexual activity which John Bradley (‘Gay Damascus’, 18 June) describes in Islamic countries is also widespread in other, relatively primitive parts of the world.

GIF Image

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in