The Spectator

Letters | 12 September 2009

Spectator readers respond to recent articles

issue 12 September 2009

Don’t bank on Osborne

Sir: Reinforcing your article on City doubts about Osborne’s economic credentials (Politics, 5 September), a City contact of mine, technically expert in a matter of finance and taxation of central interest to any Chancellor, had a meeting with Osborne a few months back. He found Osborne not only badly briefed and largely ignorant, but disengaged and uninterested in the subject. Neither was he the first, I believe, to have found Osborne arrogant and barely civil. Apart from a very evident need to bone up on economic and City matters, someone in CCHQ clearly needs to make him a present of Dale Carnegie’s famous little book.

Adrian Gobbi
North Yorkshire



Quango tree

Sir: Dennis Sewell rightly highlights the deleterious effect of the quangocracy (‘Cameron must cull the quangos’, 5 September). However, more is needed than just a cull.

Many public sector organisations justify the expansion of their bureaucracy on the grounds they are fulfilling mandatory requirements. For example, in the NHS there are diversity policies. All NHS staff, regardless of what they do, are required to attend diversity training. To be truly effective, David Cameron will have to undertake a root-and-branch removal of government directives, which have brought about this expansion of bureaucracy.

Rob Kendrick
by email




Name the date

Sir: As someone who got married after a 20-month courtship, I am staggered that some websites advise that 24 months are required to arrange a wedding (‘The price of true love’, 29 August). I am reminded of a former colleague who, one December, when asked by a taxi driver if she had any New Year’s resolutions, told him that she had two, the second of which was to get married that year. When the cabbie asked what her other half thought of her plan, she confessed that she hadn’t yet found a suitable boyfriend, and, after only a brief hesitation, added: ‘That’s my first resolution.

Illustration Image

Disagree with half of it, enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in