The Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, and his chosen Attorney-General, Baron Hermer, both professional lawyers, seem to take the view that lying is just an aspect of public relations and parliament an irrelevance. As the Roman republic collapsed under the assault led by Julius Caesar and Marc Anthony, Cicero reflected, in those perilous times, on the nature of the relationship between civil law (ius civile, the term given to the bulk of statute law in Rome) and government and how it might be enabled to control the situation.
He turned, for example, to the jurists. These freelance experts in law, though they had no professional standing whatsoever, provided opinions on legal matters to anyone who wanted them. What, he wondered, would they have made of the legal situation in 510 bc when Lucretia was raped by the king’s son and the king’s family was thrown out, leading to the emergence of a republic? At that time, Cicero pointed out, there was no written law against rape, but any jurist worth his salt would unquestionably have justified that expulsion for an obvious crime against humanity. ‘Natural law’ demanded it.
That the essence of law should be framed in similar broad terms, whatever the specific details of the law at any time, seemed to Cicero to be an important principle. So he identified examples of what he meant, all of which were abstractions regularly referenced by jurists and judges in giving their opinions, such as fairness (aequitas), custom (mos) and good faith (bona fides). He went on to argue that the overriding principle, for him at any rate, was salus populi, ‘the security of the people’.
Magazine articles are subscriber-only. Keep reading for just £1 a month
SUBSCRIBE TODAY- Free delivery of the magazine
- Unlimited website and app access
- Subscriber-only newsletters
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in