James Forsyth James Forsyth

Laws’s resignation is a disaster for the coalition in all but one respect

James Forsyth reviews the week in politics

issue 05 June 2010

James Forsyth reviews the week in politics

Straight after David Cameron had announced his final offer to the Liberal Democrats — a referendum on Westminster’s voting system in exchange for entering into coalition — I bumped into a member of the Tory Cabinet. I asked him if he thought that the offer was unnecessary seeing as a ‘coalition of the losers’ between the Labour and the Liberal Democrats was so unlikely to succeed. This Tory disagreed. He argued that the reward — the reunification of the right — was well worth the risk.

My companion soon warmed to his theme. He set about explaining how a Liberal-Tory coalition is what Churchill would have wanted, that it would bring together the two strands of right-wing thinking in this country that had been separated by quarrels over social issues. Look, he said, at David Laws. He was an economic liberal but was not a Tory because of ‘Section 28 and all that stuff’.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in