Along with defence, there’s one other area where rolling back the state
doesn’t come naturally to Conservatives: criminal justice. The massive cuts looming on the horizon for the criminal justice system would have been politically toxic for any party to deliver,
but for the traditional party of law and order there will be a special discomfort.
Ken Clarke’s speech this morning was much less exciting for the penal reform/abolitionist lobby than the morning papers indicated. Echoing Nick Herbert’s speech to Policy Exchange last
week, the Justice Secretary rightly said that that the test of a successful criminal justice system was not simply the number of people you lock up – but in the Q&A session, he revealed that he
was not, in fact, seeking to reduce the prison population (indeed a contract for the building of a new prison is due to be signed tomorrow).
Of course, the Prison Service will have to bear its share of the burden of fiscal consolidation.
Max Chambers
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in