Francis Vorhies

Labour’s trophy hunting ban is confused

Credit: Ivan Lieman/AFP/Getty Images

Labour’s election manifesto promised to ban the importation of hunting trophies. This is part of a campaign spearheaded by animal rights activists in Britain. It is well-intentioned, and driven by a wish to protect endangered species. But it just happens to be entirely counterproductive.

Trophy hunting, when properly managed, supports wildlife conservation. It generates revenue for habitat protection and anti-poaching efforts, makes people want to protect wildlife and supports local communities. In fact, most trophies are imported from countries with stable populations of hunted species, including South Africa, Namibia, and Zambia.

It is condescending for rich British activists to tell African countries how they are meant to manage conservation and development. As Shylock Muyengwa, of communities charity Resource Africa, has said: ‘Colonialism is over – yet British politicians still forget to respect the will of African communities. We should be viewed as partners in conservation, not as British subjects that are forced to adhere to policies that please the British public who don’t have to live alongside elephants, lions or other dangerous animals.

Written by
Francis Vorhies

Dr Francis Vorhies is Director of the African Wildlife Economy Institute at Stellenbosch University in South Africa and a Research Visitor at the Wildlife Conservation Research Unit at the University of Oxford.

Topics in this article

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in