John Kampfner launches a scathing attack on New Labour in today’s Guardian. He characterises New Labour as a movement obsessed with micro-politics that ignores broad political context, leaving a legacy of missed opportunities of which the government are oblivious. He sees Harman’s and Mandelson’s leadership posturing in the same light:
‘Harman has set out her stall as a radical, but her record is unconvincing. Where was she all these years? I don’t remember her previously railing against Blairite subservience towards the wealthy. Indeed, when I last interviewed her, during Labour’s deputy leadership contest in 2007, she struck me as quite comfortable with the status quo. So one must work from the assumption that this is positioning, a calculation that the electoral college of a Labour party emaciated after a general election defeat would warm to this tune.
‘Mandelson’s improbable emergence as a leadership candidate, promoted by journalists who remain transfixed by his apparent charms, suggests that the Labour hierarchy puts its current woes down purely to Brown’s inability to communicate with voters.
Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just £1 a month
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just £1 a monthAlready a subscriber? Log in