Michael Tanner

Khovanskygate is about the dreadfulness and possible glory of being Russian

Plus: Danielle de Niese irritates in the Met’s otherwise musically marvellous new Così fan tutte

Memorable: Joseph Guyton as Andrei Khovansky in ‘Khovanskygate’ [Getty Images/Shutterstock/iStock/Alamy] 
issue 03 May 2014

Within the space of a few weeks we have had the rare chance of seeing the two great torsos of Russian opera, Borodin’s Prince Igor, unfinished because the composer was often otherwise engaged, and Musorgsky’s Khovanshchina, unfinished because its composer died of drink. Prince Igor at the Coliseum was musically magnificent, and dramatically utterly absurd, ‘self-parody’ that did not do justice to its low-jinks. By contrast, Birmingham Opera Company’s Khovanskygate is musically at least as superb, and dramatically gripping though questionable. As is usual with BOC, the location is unorthodox, in this case an immense tent in the middle of Cannon Hill Park. No seats, except for the disabled, and a lot of being shoved around by members of the chorus or other performers. I’m not sure why we always have to move around so much, but it is a long-established tradition of BOC’s, to make us all feel part of it, I suppose.

The new English version by Max Hoehn was only intermittently intelligible to me, but one more or less takes for granted that Khovanshchina, in any form, is impossible to follow. It seemed that we were being asked — especially since Graham Vick is the director — to draw parallels between the miseries of the Russian people, and the corrupt politicians who rule them, and our own situation. So the TV News that we saw on entering was about fanatical religious groups urging repeal of liberalising laws on gay marriage and abortion, and on female bishops. But how does that fit in with Russian history and politics?

One of the things that makes Khovanshchina a great wreck of a work is that it is specifically about the dreadfulness and possible glory of being Russian.

GIF Image

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in