Keir Starmer is right to cut foreign aid

It was inevitable that the announced cut to Britain’s international aid budget would cause a stir. The curtailment earlier this month of the USAID programme provoked outrage among progressive voices worldwide, despite the fact that scheme funded some dubious causes. Why, then, would our compassionate classes react any different?

Yesterday, Prime Minister Keir Starmer explained that his plan to increase defence spending would be partly balanced by a reduction in the aid budget, from 0.5 per cent to 0.3 per cent of GDP. Some of his Labour colleagues aren’t happy. Sarah Champion, the Labour chair of the international development committee, reacted: ‘Conflict is often an outcome of desperation, climate and insecurity; our finances should be spent on preventing this, not the deadly consequences.’ Elsewhere, Clare Short concluded her thoughts on the matter: ‘I am afraid that, in many respects, this is simply not a Labour government’.

Further afield, Romilly Greenhill, the chief executive of Bond, which represents British aid organisations, denounced this ‘shortsighted and appalling move’ which would ‘have devastating consequences for millions of marginalised people worldwide’.