James Delingpole James Delingpole

James Delingpole: The Wrong Mans leaves me gasping with exhilaration and glee

The comedy thriller is like watching Bond smash his car into a David Brent strategy meeting — but it works

issue 19 October 2013

Among the criticisms rightly levelled at the BBC are that its commissioning editors are overcautious, unimaginative, unadventurous and over-reliant on star names and proven formulae.

So I really didn’t have much hope for The Wrong Mans (BBC2, Tuesday), the latest vehicle for the painfully ubiquitous James Corden. Since Gavin & Stacey — which I know we’re all supposed to have cherished beyond measure — Corden has become as inescapable a part of the BBC furniture as David Jason was in the Eighties, or Robson & Jerome were in the Nineties. If Corden had pitched a script based on the Albanian telephone directory, I’m sure the BBC would have commissioned it like a shot. As indeed they did when Corden proffered something nearly as ominous: a comedy thriller set in and around Bracknell.

Bracknell? Oh dear. Wasn’t the so-dull-it’s-funny theme done to death when Ricky Gervais set The Office in Slough? Comedy thriller? That’s even worse. The reason the comedy thriller is the most reliably disappointing genre ever invented (apart from maybe jazz funk) is that each half of it continually undermines the other: the jokes and pratfalling prevent the build-up of tension; the necessary darkness, death and menace make the humour look tasteless and intrusive.

The Wrong Mans

How come, then, that The Wrong Mans has turned out to be one of the most inspired and reliably enjoyable things on TV this year? Let’s start with the premise: Mathew Baynton plays Sam, the second most useless worker at the world’s dullest town council; and James Corden plays the worst — Phil Bourne, an insufferable attention-seeker from the postroom loathed by everyone for his irritating banter, his desperate courting of popularity and his pathetic fantasies of becoming an adventure hero.

Illustration Image

Disagree with half of it, enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in