When I read the scoop about Jacqui Smith’s housing arrangements in The Mail on Sunday my first reaction wasn’t shock or outrage, but a general feeling of there’s another one. Several other stories struck me—and other Coffee House contributors—as more interesting. As the day went on without any comment on it from us, commenters started asking why we hadn’t blogged on it. That afternoon, I added this PS to a post on the News of the World’s scoop about unemployment being expected to hit 3.5 million:
“Some Coffee Housers have asked why we haven’t blogged on Jacqui Smith’s housing arrangements. Frankly, I don’t have much to say except that it seems like another case of an arrangement that is within the letter but not the spirit of the regulations and is corrosive of the public’s trust in politicians. Also when you consider the costs of the police protecting her sister’s house, one sees why grace and favour flats actually make sense.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in