David Cameron’s decision to bin the disastrous measure of child poverty is an important step towards improving young people’s life chances. Its very existence has led policymakers to use tax credits to manipulate this metric, rather than turn lives around.
Child poverty refers to parents, not children: the parents whose income is below 60pc of the national average. This was set up by left-wing academics in the 1960s and then adopted by Eurostat. This means, for example, that ‘poverty’ can fall during a recession (as it did after the financial crisis), or rise if the state pension goes up. Children can go to bed in poverty and wake up out of it without experiencing any change in their lives whatsoever. Such a metric claims that child poverty is higher now than it was in the 1970s (when material deprivation was clearly much higher). It claims there’s less child poverty in Poland than the UK.
But the target was enthusiastically embraced by Gordon Brown who correctly worked out the ‘child poverty’ was a new name he could give to redistribution of wealth. Ten
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in