Graham Watts

It is time for Grenfell Tower to come down

(Photo: Getty)

The government’s decision to demolish the remaining hulk of the Grenfell Tower, announced on Wednesday evening by Angela Rayner at a meeting of victims’ families and survivors, has inevitably attracted mixed views and controversy.

Grenfell United – an amalgamation of groups representing survivors and the bereaved families of Grenfell – immediately issued a statement, saying there had been a lack of meaningful consultation with those closely affected by the fire. They alleged that the Deputy Prime Minister could not give a reason for demolishing the tower and that she ‘refused to confirm how many bereaved and survivors had been spoken to in the recent, short four-week consultation.’ 

Building safety must surely be at the core of any decision regarding the tower

However, another prominent group, Grenfell Next of Kin (GNOK) representing the families of those who perished in the Tower, has taken a more conciliatory line. Their statement following the Rayner meeting gave a very different view of the way the government had handled the consultation process: ‘It is a deeply sensitive decision and one that came after a thorough engagement process.’

Written by
Graham Watts
Graham Watts is Chief Executive of the Construction Industry Council; chair of the Industry’s Competence Steering Group; and co-lead of the Construction Leadership Council’s Building Safety workstream. He is also Chairman of the Dance Section of The Critics’ Circle and of the UK National Dance Awards. He was appointed OBE in 2008.

Topics in this article

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in